tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post7291875467988764028..comments2024-01-22T18:47:37.815-06:00Comments on The Real Sporer: Steve King has ‘em, why don’t more of us?Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-53092718028328854802007-06-24T14:52:00.000-05:002007-06-24T14:52:00.000-05:00We're not moody at all RF.. Pelosi was in the wron...We're not moody at all RF.. <BR/><BR/>Pelosi was in the wrong..and she's being backed up by members of her own party and unfortunately weak kneed GOP members who don't want to create a stink.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-33829499423657375052007-06-22T16:14:00.000-05:002007-06-22T16:14:00.000-05:00WAR Hot mature women who are not afraid of the bad...WAR Hot mature women who are not afraid of the bad guys!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-26018550313698661852007-06-22T16:05:00.000-05:002007-06-22T16:05:00.000-05:00King's amendment was defeated 337-84. Hastert did...King's amendment was defeated 337-84. Hastert did not vote. From TPMcafe.com:<BR/> <BR/><BR/><BR/>"The amendment -- attached to appropriations legislation -- would have prohibited Pelosi from using State Department funds to visit Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan or Syria.<BR/><BR/>"Needless to say, all the Democrats voted against it, thus confirming once again the party's uniformly traitorous bent. <BR/><BR/>"However, only 84 of 201 Republicans voted for the measure, suggesting that many Republicans, too, think it's okay for Pelosi to consort with the enemy. Go figure."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-76901688670414509222007-06-22T15:58:00.000-05:002007-06-22T15:58:00.000-05:00You people are really grasping at straws here. A ...You people are really grasping at straws here. A bit moody after a 6.5-year fiasco?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-26258522950758614102007-06-22T15:10:00.000-05:002007-06-22T15:10:00.000-05:00Spotlight.. If that's best you've got..you're a co...Spotlight.. If that's best you've got..you're a complete and utter fool.<BR/><BR/>Pelosi was asked repeatedly by the Administration NOT to go to Syria..she went anyways..<BR/><BR/>She went to Syria..claming to send a message to Syria from Israel..to which the Israelis very quickly proved was completely incorrect.<BR/><BR/>We consider Syria to be a state-sponsor of terrorism throughout the world...yet the Speaker seems to think that all we have to do is "talk" and everything will be all better.<BR/><BR/>There is a reason why these people our are enemies..there is a reason why we do not do "business" with them...They can not be trusted..nor are they willing to conduct business of state in an acceptable manner (meaning not promoting terrorism!)<BR/><BR/>Pelosi was trying to send a subtle message to Syria--"You should deal with me, not Bush..I'm really the one calling the shots here now"...Cedar Waxwinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00345138892572098352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-7975743335471516512007-06-22T14:03:00.000-05:002007-06-22T14:03:00.000-05:00Spotlight:Gingrich went with Clinton's Presidenti...Spotlight:<BR/><BR/>Gingrich went with Clinton's Presidential delegation. Remember the great press/SNL skit you D's pushed about him crying about being seated way in the back of AF1?<BR/><BR/>Hastert went with the President's blessing.<BR/><BR/>NEXTAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-69406018899621372232007-06-22T13:52:00.000-05:002007-06-22T13:52:00.000-05:00Gingrich: ChinaHastert: ColumbiaYou can't just tal...Gingrich: China<BR/>Hastert: Columbia<BR/><BR/>You can't just talk to your allies. You have to talk to everyone. Unless war is your preferred way of dealing with the world.<BR/><BR/>About Pelosi in Syria: "Despite the inference that the White House has tried to draw concerning Pelosi’s trip to Syria, the administration has failed to produce any evidence that she did or said anything in her meetings in Damascus that went beyond her role or responsibilities as a member of Congress. Indeed, her schedule was arranged by the U.S. Embassy there and diplomatic personnel representing the president were present at all times. It is certain the White House would have known instantly had such a breech of conduct had occurred." from ThinkProgress at <BR/>http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2007/04/pelosi.htmlAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-5480166381079569322007-06-22T12:41:00.000-05:002007-06-22T12:41:00.000-05:00Hey Spotlight..What countries did Hastert/Gingeric...Hey Spotlight..<BR/><BR/>What countries did Hastert/Gingerich negotiate with?<BR/><BR/>Pelosi went to countries with whom we have little to no diplomatic ties with..for a very good reason.. THEY"RE SPONSORS OF TERRORISM!<BR/><BR/>And for her to go over there..and to try to represent the US and policy that is CONTRARY to the stated policy of the United States is a blatant violation of the Logan Act..pure and simpleCedar Waxwinghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00345138892572098352noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-75276238738249637842007-06-21T22:44:00.000-05:002007-06-21T22:44:00.000-05:00I REALLY hope Steve King runs for Senate against H...I REALLY hope Steve King runs for Senate against Harkin........but Harkin would probably win with 80% of the vote.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-53464541621041163922007-06-21T22:19:00.000-05:002007-06-21T22:19:00.000-05:00Steve King is one of the true heroes in our Congre...Steve King is one of the true heroes in our Congress. Too bad he is not running for President. I know he'd do very well in Iowa as well as other states.Ken Rhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12920508283824085783noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-7945437233116605942007-06-21T21:33:00.000-05:002007-06-21T21:33:00.000-05:00And then, Steve King comes along. He really does...And then, Steve King comes along. He really does fight the fights we want fought. This is a great move. Way to go fight for National Security! You absolutely never have to guess where he stands. He says what he means and he means what he says. That's refreshing.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-52764808232658921192007-06-21T21:28:00.000-05:002007-06-21T21:28:00.000-05:00Whatever....this is now. It is immaterial to the ...Whatever....this is now. It is immaterial to the discussion at hand. How about you respond to the current issue being discussed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-65316140181406909702007-06-21T21:24:00.000-05:002007-06-21T21:24:00.000-05:00Maybe O'Really remembers this discussion better th...Maybe O'Really remembers this discussion better than Mr. Sporer does, so he's moved on.<BR/><BR/>Remember, Gingrich and Hastert did much more blatant "negotiating" when they were Speaker and the Rs all were cool with it. So this sounds a tad partisan.<BR/><BR/>And what's this about our enemy wanting to control the world economy and destroy Israel? I thought they had WMD and hated us for our freedoms! Is this still the same war?<BR/><BR/>As for isolating Syria and then "collapsing" both them and Iran, Adams had something to say about that, too:<BR/><BR/>"America goes not abroad in search of monsters to destroy."<BR/><BR/>Such good advice. Like you said, Mr. Sporer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-30015942.post-36768207323874040832007-06-21T19:26:00.000-05:002007-06-21T19:26:00.000-05:00spot on papa bear!why isn't O'Reilly on all over t...spot on papa bear!<BR/><BR/>why isn't O'Reilly on all over this issue?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com