……….. you find Democrats. This morning the results of the Democrat’s study of Democrat hiring practices in state government provides yet another display of the basic hypocrisy of the Democrats almost constant characterization of Republicans as a party of racism.
We’ve heard it al, without any factual basis what so ever. Republicans burn churches to keep blacks from gathering to worship. Republicans use state police to keep black people from voting. Republicans cut welfare to starve poor black people. This idiocy reached its pinnacle with Kanye West announcing that George Bush hates black people as the reason George Bush not only caused hurricane Katrina, but targeted it at New Orleans to cause the maximum dislocation and dispersion of black political power.
Now the Democrats have controlled state hiring over the last eight years in Iowa. Democrat hiring practices have obviously favored whites. Every aspect of the Democrat hiring process has under-included minorities.
Just think, this is the reward that Democrats give their most loyal constituency. What do you think they have in mind for the rest of us?
We’ve heard it al, without any factual basis what so ever. Republicans burn churches to keep blacks from gathering to worship. Republicans use state police to keep black people from voting. Republicans cut welfare to starve poor black people. This idiocy reached its pinnacle with Kanye West announcing that George Bush hates black people as the reason George Bush not only caused hurricane Katrina, but targeted it at New Orleans to cause the maximum dislocation and dispersion of black political power.
Now the Democrats have controlled state hiring over the last eight years in Iowa. Democrat hiring practices have obviously favored whites. Every aspect of the Democrat hiring process has under-included minorities.
Just think, this is the reward that Democrats give their most loyal constituency. What do you think they have in mind for the rest of us?
.jpg)
10 comments:
no way sporer-the democrats would never pander.
didn't you know that bill clinton was the first black president?
You miss a couple of weeks, you miss a lot. Krusty gone. Sporer with a nice new look. A couple of R prez debates.
But after a quick review, it’s clear some things don’t change here on Sporer. The illogical defense of the indefensible (the Big Blunder) continues with gusto. I know it’s part of the job description for an R official, but it must kill Sporer deep inside to come up with the stuff. As I’ve said before, I’ll really enjoy the show when the R machine starts to distance itself from the BB after the R nominee is known.
BTW, who all is included in the “we” that seems to produce the blog now?
That bullshit on MSNBC can hardly be called a debate.
rf-other than citing the existence of conflict itself as the definition of defeat, what evidence is there.
the most aggressive estimates place the terrorists in Iraq at around 25,000. Most, as in over 80% of the Iraqis say their lives have improved since Saddam and they think they will continue to improve next year.
The enemy in Iraq has no alternative government nor territorial control (as in we can go anywhere we want openly in Iraq and they terrorist and violent insurgents can only go undercover) nor army in the fied. They control no mass media and rely on couriers and the internet for communication.
They pose little risk to the coalition military (our casualties are tiny by any historically relevant analog). So clearly, we are "losing". The only place we are losing is in the mind of the defeatist liberals.
At least you're honest as I'm guessing you opposed the war in the first place. Bottom line, the exitence of conflict is not the definition of defeat.
But on a happier note, you have to be really pissed at the D candidates for not debating on Fox.
The questions were both more serious, more designed to allow the candidates to make their case to be President, and produced far more clash.
Oh, and the audience was four times as big. Fox has more Democrats in its audience than CNN and MSNBC combined.
......... and finally we've never been a one man band. The Real Sporer's Hot Spouse (Jo Ellen Hill) has always been a contributor.
I've added some additional correspondents as well. Some wish to remain anonymous and some will publicly acknowledge their content. One is Mark Lucas, from whom we are going to hear tonight. Mark is a colleague on the SCC.
colleagues I meant as my buddy the Big Killer (Carl Gilbertson) who is a 1st District SCC member as well will have a Thompson event review tonight as we have expanded our news coverage as well.
Mark's story is also big national news.
Had to miss both R debates, so I can't compare the two. But you are right, I'm pissed about D's skipping Fox. Stupid pandering.
Yes, I opposed the war from the beginning. Proabably couldn't articulate my reasoning as well as Obama did at that time, but my feelings were definitely very similar.
What evidence is there to support the claims about the BB helping us in WOT? I'm afraid most empirical evidence is on my side on this one. Or are you seriously claiming we are in a stronger and strategically better place now than in early 2002 due to BB?
Anyways, it's too bad you have your partisan position. Without the partisan bs, I suspect we could have really interesting and productive debates.
Iraq is a great battlefield for us. Easy to supply, lots of ports and airports.
Well educated population (for the MIddle East). Should eventually be able to economiclly support itself (it has the worlds 11th largest GNP before Saddam got control). Most importantly it allows us to encircle Iran-which is vital until this younger generation gets tired of poverty and oppression and overthrows the luntics in charge there (Iran has also had tremendous economic regression since the Mullahs ousted the Shah) or they nuke Israel and we nuke them, whichever happens first.
Wouldn't it be interesting to have reportage of American victories? When we kill off a couple of dozen terrorists or miltiamen? When we almost totally clear a city? It is never covered. That might change the perception of victory vs. defeat.
I still say, and none can come up with anything other than the "we're making more terrorists" which is quite amorphous and inconsistent with a lot of other evidence, a way in which the world and the Iraqis themselves aren't better off now than with Saddam in power.
Take a minute and read the debate transcripts. The first one sounds like a joke even when reading it.
Post a Comment