The Real Sporer heard John Edwards statements about the War on Terror tonight. The Breck Girl better stick to friendly audiences, he sounds more like America's next top model than its next President. Since The Breck Girl and I have about the same chance of becoming President, here's a challenge from me, a little 'ol small town lawyer, to the Uber-lawyer and Senator; debate the Real Sporer on national security issues any time, any where, and before any audience, when you are in Iowa. C'mon, you've made a thousand times more money lawyering than me and you're better looking than me. It ought to be like Apollo Creed kicking Rocky's ass.
C'mon libs, let's say it all together now, Sporer's favorite words-
C'mon libs, let's say it all together now, Sporer's favorite words-
BRING IT ON!
11 comments:
DETROIT, July 13 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ --
Top campaign officials for Ohio Congressman and Democratic Presidential candidate Dennis Kucinich tonight expressed outrage that rival candidates Hillary Clinton and John Edwards were overheard collaborating on a strategy to eliminate other Democratic candidates from future debates and forums.
According to the Associated Press, Fox News Channel microphones picked up Clinton and Edwards on stage discussing their desire to limit future joint appearances to exclude some rivals lower in the crowded field.
"We should try to have a more serious and a smaller group," Edwards said into Clinton's ear following a Presidential Forum in Detroit hosted by the NAACP on Thursday.
Edwards wants to kick out the others because he knows he is now a 2nd tier candidate. Only Billary and Obama are 1st tier. If he can kick out the other lesser d's, he appears to not be a lesser d himself.
It's too late Mr. Edwards.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds former Tennessee Senator Fred Thompson and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani essentially tied for the lead. It’s Thompson at 25% and Giuliani at 24%.
Trailing the frontrunners at a distance are former Massachusetts Governor Mitt Romney and Arizona Senator John McCain. They’re tied at 12%.
Friday, July 13, 2007
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds Clinton with 38% of the vote, Obama at 26% and former North Carolina Senator John Edwards at 13%. Those results are virtually unchanged from our previous poll.
Results throughout the week were stable for all candidates except McCain.
The man from Arizona earned 14% support in the poll on Monday and Tuesday nights before slipping to 10% on Wednesday and Thursday.
Interestingly, that support did not flow to any other candidate; the number of undecideds grew from 18% early in the week to 22% later in the week. On Tuesday, the McCain campaign organization imploded when the campaign manager, chief strategist, and other top officials left.
It remains to be seen whether the dip in support for McCain is the beginning of a trend, a temporary blip, or statistical noise.
Rasmussen Reports will release our next update of the Republican race on Monday, July 16 and begin daily tracking at that time.
Separate polling released yesterday showed that a plurality of voters now have an unfavorable opinion of the Arizona Senator.
Among Republicans, McCain is viewed favorably by 55% and unfavorably by 40%. That same survey showed McCain falling further behind Senator Hillary Clinton.
Another survey released yesterday showed Giuliani trailing Clinton by just a single percentage point.
Clinton is tied with Thompson and holds a four-point advantage over Romney.
Many Washington insiders tend to dismiss Thompson for a variety of reasons, but it is not clear how well these insiders understand GOP primary voters.
After all, they misjudged reaction to both Giuliani and McCain (to say nothing of a total misreading of the public during the immigration debate).
More from Rasmussen:
For Romney, the question about his viability is the same, but it is asked from a different perspective.
Many insiders have long viewed him as the natural conservative challenger to Giuliani.
He’s good looking, rich, and has built a serious campaign organization.
But, for Romney, the polling numbers have been less than exhilarating.
In national polling, the man from Massachusetts has struggled in the 10% to 12% range for months and can’t seem to gain any traction.
Romney does lead in New Hampshire, but those numbers also suggest an underlying weakness. Romney is from neighboring Massachusetts and well known to New Hampshire voters. On top of that, he is the only candidate to be advertising on television in the state.
He should be way ahead rather than nursing a nine-point lead. Will his advantage hold when other candidates begin to get their message out on the airwaves? If he ekes out a narrow victory on his home turf, will that help or hurt?
National polls are meaningless. The polls that matter right now are in Iowa and New Hampshire and maybe South Carolina.
Noneed4thneed,
You might be wasting your time trying to talk sense to these posters of other people's copy. But thanks for your efforts.
Sheesh, you'd think they might know how the Iowa caucus phenomenon works!
essentially estrogen sounds like she's suffering from case of PMS.
Post a Comment