Friday, June 27, 2008

Ann Coulter irrefutably makes Newt’s day-drill now!




Don’t need to say anything more, but briefly we must:
Coulter’s
analysis of the energy situation is more accurate and deadly to the liberal propaganda machine than MOAB.
Read it; learn it; and repeat it. More importantly, much more importantly –



DRILL NOW
VOTE REPUBLICAN

11 comments:

RF said...

So how do you folks feel about Newt in the climate change ads they've been running lately? Has Newt made any comments on the drilling issue? - I'm really just curious, considering his apparent reversal on climate change.

As I said in a previous thread, it's not like the oil companies don't have any new places to drill. Why do they need ANWR or our coastal areas when they are not utilizing the vast areas they already have at their disposal? Or maybe the whole issue is just a political tool for R's?

Anonymous said...

Ann Coulter is a man.

Art A Layman said...

sporie:

Don't know if Ann Coulter is a man but she certainly has balls and like all of us men she uses them to think with.

There are 66 bbo (billion barrels of all) estimated to be in the OCS that is open to leasing. Now all of that leasing area can't be off the tip of southern Africa. The NPR-A has 4.6 million acres available for oil leasing. This is an area of Alaska that is in the general vicinity of ANWR and estimates are that there is plenty of oil there, yet only, I think it was 3%, of that land has been explored or drilled or even leased.

Unless the objective should just be to open up the world and let big oil cherry-pick where they want to explore and drill they've got plenty of opportunities in current leases or leasable areas right now. Just recently there was a re-evaluation of the Bakken area of North Dakota/Montana estimating 3.3 bbo adjacent to areas already being drilled.

Do you guys ever consider that the oil companies do not have an infinite supply of exploration and drilling equipment? Especially for offshore exploration/drilling.

The other issue you guys fail to grasp is the dichotomy at play here. Let's assume that the oil companies could begin increasing oil supplies tomorrow and therefore drive down prices immediately saving consumers and our economy. What then happens to their profits? They go down, in a hurry.

Big oil is perfectly happy to maintain a balance between world demand and supply. They do not desire an abundance of supply driving prices lower. Leaving supply/demand equal keeps the price of oil high and renders it subject to rising every time Ahmadinejad sneezes.

One would have thought you were bright enough to realize that Ann Coulter is a blithering idiot.

Anonymous said...

http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=652

Anonymous said...

I'd like to make sweet love to Ann. She needs a little tenderness in her life. Then after that, I'd fuck her good.

Art A Layman said...

1:57:

I think you fail to appreciate the lady(?). It is more likely she would be the one "doing" her partner "good".

vlad the impaler said...

Newt the Wonder Twerp got off the couch with Pelosi long enough to do something? Newt and McCain's radical environmentalist friends will probably convince them that drilling might annoy a chipmunk and Johnny Mac would then scrap the whole idea.

Anonymous said...

Ann Coulter is a man.

Anonymous said...

Are Ann's tits real or surgically enhanced?

Anonymous said...

Is she pre op or post op?

muebles jaen said...

This won't work in reality, that is what I suppose.

Labels

Amazon Bookstore