Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Republican Debate Review.........Huck, Rudy and John

The fourth debate is in the books. Tonight presented a far better format, with far more intramural clash, than in any of the predecessor events. Huckabee stole the show tonight, with Rudy close on his heals and McCain rebounding hard. I still don’t know why we have moderators at all. Shouldn’t someone who wants to be President of the United States be able to stand his ground on a stage with his competitors without any direction or editing?

As usual. we’re going to rate each debater on a scale of 1-30. The ratings are based in part on presentation, part on content and part on the stage management of the occasion. In alphabetical order:

Sam Brownback Sam seemed very off his game tonight. Sam started the debate series with a great performance in the first debate but has consistently been kind of a wall flower in the last three debates. Sam had a couple of great answers but was unable to produce a dominant posture on even his strongest answers about family and homosexual marriage; while again tremendously articulate he didn’t generate a powerful presence. Sam is a complex legal thinker but he has not demonstrated the ability to exploit the debate format.

1st debate/25
2nd debate/21
3rd debate/22
4th debate/20

Rudy Giuliani. Rudy was great tonight. His answers are almost entirely direct. He minimized damage on his weaknesses-like his utterly chaotic family life-by giving the smart argument. Rudy repeatedly targeted the Democrats and, more importantly, seemed like a tough and competent, if somewhat strangely idiosyncratic, leader. His shot at Fred was great to start. His answer on Guantanamo was also killer, fact based, much like a President in the making telling people what they need but wish not to hear. Giuliani always comes back to competence and measurable results; two very reassuring traits to the average voter.

1st debate/21
2nd debate/27
3rd debate/27
4th debate/28

Mike Huckabee. Huck just keeps getting better. Tonight he really started to step out from behind the “social conservative” template. While Ron Paul is an easy target, Huck’s smack down made him look tough-and a lack of toughness was one of the worst knocks on Huck. He defended the Fair Tax well and talked tough on foreign policy. He also showed the ability to dodge questions and stay on message without seeming to have just ducked the question entirely.
1st debate/25
2nd debate/27
3rd debate/28
4th debate/29

Duncan Hunter. He smiled broadly for the first time. Keep it up Duncan-it looks good. I have said it before-Duncan Hunter just seems like he should be the Commander in Chief. I almost completely agree with every word he utters. He also showed a very clear vision for the world tonight. Unfortunately, he has the reverse problem from Sam and, previously, Huck-he only gets foreign policy questions. Let’s be honest-you just know that he would blow those Iranian monsters back into the stone age!

1st debate/23
2nd debate/24
3rd debate/25
4th debate/27

John McCain. Sen. McCain started out slow, old and over rehearsed; getting to speak last on his own ground allowed him to end passionate, serious and wise. John’s somewhat undeserved slap down on Mitt over the word “apparent” made Sen. McCain look resolute and committed. He is the only guy other than Tancredo who really talks about the big war and the need for strength, and the consequences of appearing weak. The Senator’s answer on taxes reminded me of his opposition of the President’s tax cuts-back when he was running for the Non-Party Party nomination. Actually, it reminded me of the personal nature of his fights with W. None the less, a huge debate improvement for the Senator tonight, both on style and substance.

1st debate/23
2nd debate/24
3rd debate/ 24
4th debate/ 27

Ron Paul. How maddening. The libertarian in me screams yes on so much of what he says. Then the pragmatist returns to the real world. Rudy pounded at him in the first debate, Huck used him as foil with brilliance tonight. You never want the most memorable moment of one on these things to be on the other guy’s highlight film. But he was more theatrical (compliment), and he made better arguments for his sometimes simply unsupportable positions than he has in the past events.

1st debate/21
2nd debate/20
3rd debate/21
4th debate/26

Mitt Romney. This was Mitt’s weakest outing, mostly because he was the target tonight. His answers seemed nuanced far too often, which just feeds the flip-flop image. When you’re one of the clear front runners, a status I believe Mitt now occupies, even a little mistake like using the word “apparent” to describe the Surge’s success can be exploited. Much attention was paid to Mitt’s issue evolution and his defenses seemed somewhat, insincere. Mitt remained calm and didn’t get rattled. He does handle the misstatement about his boys’ service quite well, it was a misstatement that just did not come out right. Isn’t it time to give the guy a break and move off this non issue?

1st debate/25
2nd debate/24
3rd debate/27
4th debate/ 24

Tom Tancredo. He is just so sincere and real. The Tanc had the tonic but lacked stage presence. His response on Iraq was somewhat incoherent. However, the Tanc’s attack on global jihad and the extent to which we are being suicidal with this political correctness were, as usual, great.

1st debate/21
2nd debate/22
3rd debate/24
4th debate/ 23

The ratings neither reflect my personal support for a candidate nor a belief as to the ultimate nominee. We have a very long way to go before that issue is decided and, of course, the nominee might not even have been on the stage.

Debate coverage and live blogging, Rocky Mountain Style

The Real Sporer has been invited to participate as a panelist for Denver’s Rocky Mountain Times “Back Roads to the White House Blog” tonight. I can’t wait, and it should be fun.

We will have our usual post debate analysis, complete with speaker points, later tonight.

I have returned.

After being driven from the internet for a couple of weeks by technology and chronology, I came through and the Real Sporer is back, and we’re better than ever baby.

We have missed a lot over the last few weeks. The surge is working, the rebellion is in the process of being crushed and the networks have gone silent on Iraq. Headline coverage of American casualties remains the only real Iraq coverage in the MSM.

The economy maintained full employment, real wages grew and the Dow has remained over 13,000. Our last recession began during the last quarter of the Clinton Administration, not last week as the MSM portrayed.

Fred Thompson is growing closer to becoming a candidate. John Edwards is growing closer to becoming a footnote in American history, and seven-point footnote at that.

Michael Vick pled guilty and the usual race baiters claimed that the prosecution was race based. After all, they argue, dog fighting is part of black culture and should, therefore, be placed in proper context, which apparently means excused. Although I doubt that premise to be true, if so, so what? Genital mutilation is part of some cultures but we don’t tolerate that cultural norm here either. Michael Vick is getting off easy and should have to face the dogs, or lions and tigers and bears if he bests the dogs.

Larry Craig’s apparently very wide stance in the bathroom caused him to plead guilty and then resign, and then withdraw his guilty plea and his resignation. Senator, stick with the guilty plea and ride off into a lucrative sunset. Anyone who pleads guilty to committing an illegal homosexual act in a public place when they are, in fact, not guilty of anything more than a “wide stance” simply lacks the intelligence to be a United States Senator.

Those crazy Clinton kids are raising money from Chinese mobsters again. Since Norman Hsu jumped bail a second time today we can probably assume that he must be hanging out with the 120 or so other Chinese mobsters that fled the United States the last time the Clintons got caught selling basing rights to the ChiComs for campaign cash. Where is a brother going to find a Buddhist monk when he needs absolution?

Al Gonzalez jumped off the bandwagon amidst Democrat screeches that he was the most political AG since Watergate. Strange, I would have thought that title would go to Janet Reno, the only Attorney General of the United States who actually litigated against the United States, a legal irony in which Janet Reno routinely engaged on behalf of Bill Clinton. My favorite Renoism isn’t the 120 or so Chinese mobsters whom she allowed to escape the United States but rather her attempts to prevent federal law enforcement officers from testifying about the criminal acts they witnessed Bill Clinton commit.

Best of all, football has returned to the heartland with a bang. How often do Michigan, Notre Dame and ISU all lose and the Hawks (and we all know what you are if you are not a Hawk) and Bulldogs win on the same day?

Labels